The Office of U.S. Courts writes universal injunctions
The Administrative Office of U.S. Courts, or AO, hires contractors to write federal district judge rulings regarding universal injunctions.
It is an office of 887 bureaucrats who work for the federal judiciary.
They work around the world in:
North America
U.S.
Europe
Asia
They are supposed to be accountable to Congress and the President.
Instead, they view themselves as their superior.
Congress, however, can dissolve or defund the AO.
Who then does the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts answer to?
Chief Justice John Roberts.
He hires their director, currently Robert Conrad, a retired federal judge.
Chief Justice John Roberts (above) dated May 12th
The AO does not answer public information requests because, under their law, they don’t have to.
On April 22nd, Roberts and Conrad were sued for failing to produce public records.
According to evidence filed in the DC federal court case 25-01232, Chief Justice John Roberts concocted the plot to remove Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas from the bench.
Roberts, however, needed help from co-conspirators in Congress.
They are:
Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
Hank Johnson (D-GA).
Details are in this story:
Roberts covers up his plot to remove Justices Alito, Thomas
Robert K. Conrad
Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts
The Federal Judiciary believes that they are a co-equal branch of government with the:
President
Congress
They are not.
If the Federal Judiciary were, Conrad wouldn’t have to ask Congress for more money and judges.
Here is his statement to Congress dated Christmas Eve:
Robert K. Conrad Jr.
