Voting system monopolies are in 23 states

23 States have created voting system monopolies to:

  • eliminate competitors

  • overcharge

  • prevent competition

  • encourage election fraud

It is as if voting system companies paid bribes to secure state contracts for their monopolies.

State officials and vendors who approve and sign the state contracts are subject to:

  • fines

  • asset seizure and forfeiture, and

  • imprisonment.

National security is at stake.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) also has jurisdiction over voting system monopolies.

The 23 states are:

  • Alabama

  • Arkansas

  • Colorado

  • Delaware

  • Georgia

  • Idaho

  • Iowa

  • Louisiana

  • Maine

  • Maryland

  • Michigan

  • Minnesota

  • Montana

  • Nebraska

  • New Mexico

  • North Carolina

  • North Dakota

  • Oklahoma

  • Rhode Island

  • South Carolina

  • South Dakota

  • Virginia

  • West Virginia

One vendor, ESSvote, has monopolies in 18 States.

Dominion/Liberty Vote has monopolies in:

  • Georgia

  • Colorado

  • Louisiana

  • Michigan

Hart InterCivic has a monopoly in Oklahoma.

The Trump Administration’s Antitrust Division of the Justice Department has done nothing to break up these monopolies.

However, the Obama Administration acted.

Their 2010 landmark antitrust case busted up ES&S.

  • Case Name: United States of America, et al. v. Election Systems & Software, Inc.

  • Case Number: 1:10-cv-00380

  • Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Court monitoring lasted ten years.

When it expired, ES&S found another way to regain its monopoly.

Pay for state contracts.

Was it David Becker’s idea?

He is a Hillary Clinton operative masquerading as an Election Expert for CBS.

Next
Next

Finally! A bank that finances tech and digital assets