Hilson to dismiss the Stefanie Lambert case
Dale Hilson, MI Special Prosecutor
Why would Prosecutor Dale (DJ) Hilson dismiss the Stefanie Lambert case?
Because DJ knows he will lose if the case goes to trial.
On Dec. 17th, Judge Jeffery S. Matis will set a trial date for next year.
Hilson:
However, admissions in a Grand Jury transcript by Jonathan Brater, Michigan’s Election Czar, on March 7th last year, destroys the Prosecution’s case.
Brater is Michigan’s Chief Election Officer.
He instructs the state’s election officials on election law issues.
Brater admits, however, that he has no power to enforce election law.
He can only make recommendations.
According to Brater, counties, not the State of Michigan, own the state’s election software and hardware.
Therefore, Lambert did not break Michigan law because she obtained permission from the Antrim County Clerk before examining its election systems.
Brater also said county clerks are free to sell their voting machines “on eBay for $500 . . .”
Michigan has no local Election Boards.
Instead, local county clerks of courts administer local elections.
Page 99 of Brater’s Grand Jury testimony dated March 7th, 2023
Heather Bloomquist works for Hilson in the Muskegon County, MI, Prosecutor’s Office.
Page 102 of Brater’s Grand Jury Testimony dated March 23rd, 2023
Hilson has filed motions to cover up Brater’s Grand Jury testimony from the Lambert trial.
Judge Matis will rule on the matter next month.
What is Hilson’s exit strategy?
Dismiss the Stefanie Lambert case before the trial, then refile it in a year.
She was targeted for prosecution for “misinformation” by the:
Biden-Harris Justice Department, and
David Becker, an operative of Hillary Clinton
What did Stefanie say that was allegedly “misinformation”?
“Dominion Voting Systems are run out of Serbia.”
However, evidence and emails from Dominion’s key executives proved her correct.
Details are in this story:
Dominion admits its systems are flawed and cannot be fixed
Dominion’s programmers live in Serbia
Hilson will follow the advice of Special Prosecutor Jack Smith, who dismissed the Trump criminal trial in Florida to refile in four years.
Details are in this story:
Before taking the job in Michigan, Brater worked with David Becker for three years at the Brennan Center of New York University, specializing in “election administration.”
They are in charge of Michigan’s voting and tabulation systems.
https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/MISOS/bulletins/26e0485
Details are in these stories:
Benson ceded Michigan’s elections to Hillary’s David Becker
Becker works for Hillary
Updated Dec. 17th
Judge Matis delayed ruling on a:
trial date
whether to quash Lambert’s indictment.
If the motion is approved, Stefanie’s case is dismissed.
There is no trial.
However, if dismissed, Prosecutors can file new charges.
Matis said these matters were “taken under advisement.”
The Judge said he “will rule soon.”
The next hearing is January 22nd at 1:30 p.m.
Updated Jan. 22nd
Today’s hearing was canceled.
A new date is pending.
Judge Matis was “unavailable.”
Updated Jan. 23rd
The hearing is tomorrow at 9 a.m.
Updated Jan. 24th
Today’s video hearing is a public record.
After starting a year ago, Stefanie Lambert’s trial date remains unscheduled.
The next hearing is Wednesday at 1:30 p.m.
All parties must appear in Judge Matis’ courtroom.
He discontinued video conference hearings in the Lambert case.
Prosecutors objected to appearing in person because it “was far to travel.”
However, Special Prosecutor Dale Hilson selected Oakland County, Pontiac, MI, as the site for the trial.
The Judge said Prosecutor Hilson “could send someone else in his place.”
Attorneys from both sides failed to answer direct questions from the Judge regarding their motions and responses.
Prosecutors want to block Michigan public officials from testifying and appearing in Stefanie’s trial.
Jonathan Brater, Michigan’s Election Czar, is one of those officials. He runs Michigan’s elections for Jocelyn Benson, the Secretary of State.
If something goes wrong, Benson denies knowing it and can blame Brater.
One of Brater’s best friends is David Becker, a Hillary Clinton operative.
Jonathan spent nine minutes auditing his state’s 2020 election results.
A video of his audit produced by the State of Michigan is in this story:
Prosecutors claim Brater’s testimony lacks “relevancy.”
The defense disagreed, indicating bias against his client.
What bias?
No explanation was given or asked for.
On Wednesday, Judge Matis will rule on a motion of whether he will subpoena Brater to testify as an adverse defense witness at trial.
Prosecutors want to block public testimony and court transcripts admitted into evidence by Michigan Judge Kevin Elsenheir’s William Bailey v Antrim County case.
Defense attorney Dan Hartman said that this evidence is an admission by the Special Prosecutor that his client’s actions were legal.
If accepted by Judge Matis, Prosecutor Mark Donnelly said they feared it would provide a basis for dismissing the case.
They don’t want a jury to see the Bailey transcripts at issue.
They are dated:
April 12th, 2021
March 22nd, 2021
Jan. 11th, 2021
Dec. 14th, 2020
Stefanie Lambert’s attorney said the testimony in these transcripts was from state officials working for Michigan’s Attorney General, Dana Nessel, and Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson.
Benson’s campaign for Michigan Governor started Thursday.
She allegedly steered $1.5 million in bribes to Michigan Supreme Court Judges to dismiss two election-related cases against Benson.
Details are in this story:
President Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton endorse Benson’s campaign for Michigan Governor.
Updated January 29th
Judge Matis did not schedule a trial date today for Stefanie Lambert.
However, he did the next best thing.
The Judge set a pre-trial hearing on March 5th at 1:30 p.m.
It is the last event before setting a trial date.
Matis wants to review the evidence, witness lists, and jury instructions before ruling on what the jury will see.
Today, the Judge ordered Prosecutor Dale Hilson and Michigan Election Czar Jonathan Brater to turn over evidence they have refused to disclose to the court for a year.
The Judge ruled that the evidence he specified in today’s orders is relevant to the Lambert case.
Prosecutors argued it was meaningless.
For example, Hilson and Brater have 30 days to produce public election-related data from the three Michigan counties that Lambert and her licensed experts examined.
They are:
Barry
Roscommon
Missaukee
These were the counties examined by private investigators hired by Lambert.
Permission from the Clerk of Courts preceded the examination of their voting machines.
The counties, not the State of Michigan, own their own election machines and software.
County Clerks of Court, not state officials, control local elections in Michigan.
Next, Prosecutors have until Monday at 5 p.m. to provide public transcripts from election-related non-criminal cases in Michigan.
Updated March 6th
Yesterday, Judge Matis scheduled a pre-trial for March 13th at 3 p.m.